Trusting Your Own Eyes: Visual Constructions, Proofs, and Fallacies in Mathematics

Margo Kondratieva ()
Additional contact information
Margo Kondratieva: Memorial University of Newfoundland (MUN), Faculty of Education and the Department of Mathematics and Statistics

Chapter 16 in Handbook of Cognitive Mathematics, 2022, pp 431-467 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This chapter discusses how human biological capability of seeing contributes to the cognitive development of mathematical thinking. Thus, the phenomenon of visualization in mathematics, viewed as practice of handling visual and spatial information with the aid of physical artefacts, diagrams drawn on paper and mental imagery, is examined. It is stressed that visual mental images rely on all human senses; they develop through perception, action, and language, along with the process of conceptualization of mathematical objects. The latter are considered as distinct from the physical objects, from which their properties are abstracted and generalized. One can study mathematical objects through their various semiotic representations, including visual images. Examples of geometric constructions and reasoning with figures in the Euclidean plane are provided. They reveal a possibility of finding and comparing multiple solutions with the aim of noticing new mathematical relations. These examples also illustrate that working with visual material requires and supports the development of mathematical knowledge. This includes knowledge of mathematical properties of figure’s elements and detection of underlying structure. As well, the study of non-Euclidean geometries, while significantly relying on mathematical formalism, calls for supporting visual aid. Geometrical solutions emerge through refocus of viewer’s attention from the external, visual features to internal logical characteristics of the figures. Examples of visual fallacies and paradoxes based on unfaithful images further support the idea of the importance of logical analysis of figures. They necessitate an alternative verification of what could be visually perceived as trustworthy, and call for a rigorous deductive approach in mathematics. While the role of figures in formal proofs may be disputed, visual imagery often empowers work on mathematical discovery.

Keywords: Mathematical object; Interconnecting problem; Basic geometric configuration; Visual paradox; Mental image; Geometrical construction; Visualization; Conceptualization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-03945-4_38

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031039454

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-03945-4_38

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().