 How Natural Is “Natural” in Field Research?Astrid Marie Holand ()
Chapter 10 in Transformative Learning, 2023, pp 145-160 from Springer Abstract: Abstract Not even researchers can escape their own situatedness. What does that imply for what we see and don’t see—or what we see as natural? Most of the time we are interpreting each other’s interpretations, and we do so from our own specific time and place in the world. This is one of the central paradoxes in qualitative research, calling for an awareness that what is perceived as natural always depends on one’s contextual standpoint, and understanding of the other’s. This does not open the gates to full relativism. On the contrary, data must in many senses be regarded as results of specific paradigms, patterns, or systems emerging from time-and-place-specific problem-solving. Every paradigm has something that is taken-for-granted, and which easily escapes attention. New situations can create settings that challenge what we perceive as natural, true, and possible. But we can also train ourselves in putting on a “newcomer’s gaze”. A useful tool is what is here called the gift of taking nothing for granted or certain in qualitative research. Because it is precisely the things taken for granted that we might wish to pinpoint in our research efforts. Date: 2023 There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-20439-5_10 Ordering information: This item can be ordered from DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-20439-5_10 Access Statistics for this chapter More chapters in Springer Books from Springer |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.