Raising the Bar on Impact Management and Measurement

Kusisami Hornberger ()
Additional contact information
Kusisami Hornberger: Dalberg Global Development Advisors

Chapter Chapter 9 in Scaling Impact, 2023, pp 113-126 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The main criticism of both ESG and impact investing is that it is not easy to measure and compare investments using existing nonfinancial measures. Take, for example, a recent email I received from a leading finance professional at one of the world’s largest asset managers. In the email she asked, with a hint of criticism, “How can I justify adopting an impact investing strategy if I have to choose among an alphabet soup of reporting standards, none of which clearly and consistently demonstrate results superior than if I was not to adopt them?”.

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-22614-4_9

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031226144

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-22614-4_9

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().