Preference as Symbolic Species

Emil Dinga, Camelia Oprean-Stan, Cristina Roxana Tănăsescu, Vasile Brătian and Gabriela-Mariana Ionescu
Additional contact information
Emil Dinga: Romanian Academy
Cristina Roxana Tănăsescu: Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
Vasile Brătian: Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu
Gabriela-Mariana Ionescu: Romanian Academy

Chapter Chapter 5 in Co-Evolution of Symbolic Species in the Financial Market, 2023, pp 173-238 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The chapter’s goal is to demonstrate that preference, as objectification of belief (or, according to the authors, of proference), verifies the sufficiency predicates of a symbolic species. To that end, the full mechanism of standard evolution is applied to the concept of preference in order to validate its symbolic species statute. The following step is to identify and elucidate the logical structure of the preference, namely the triad: hardcore component, functional component, and deliberative component, and to discuss the phenomena of robustness and resilience in relation to the preference on these foundations. By introducing some thresholds and plasticity properties of the preference, each component of the evolutive statute of preference is given a quite analytically deep examination.

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-31698-2_5

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031316982

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-31698-2_5

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().