The Anatomy of the Circular Economy: Goals, Strategies, Values and Scales

Nadia Lambiase () and Filippo Barbera ()
Additional contact information
Nadia Lambiase: University of Turin
Filippo Barbera: University of Turin

Chapter Chapter 3 in Innovations for Circularity and Knowledge Creation, 2024, pp 21-41 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Despite its political and public importance, there is no a single definition of the circular economy (Kirchherr J., Reike D., Hekkert M., (2017) Conceptualizing the circular economy: an analysis of 114 definitions, Resources, Conservation & Recycling.; Rizos V., Tuokko K., Behrens A., (2017) The Circular Economy: A review of definitions, processes and impacts, CEPS Research Report, No. 2017/08/April 2017. https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/circular-economy-review-definitions-processes-and-impacts/ ). The purpose of this chapter is to undertake a critical investigation of the concept of circular economy as a “boundary object” (Star, S.L. e Griesemer, J.R., (1989) Institutional Ecology, «Translations» and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, in Social Studies of Science, n. 3, pp. 387 – 420.), analytically opaque with performative valences. This configures the circular economy as a stake-in-game whose meaning is subject to negotiations among actors, at cognitive, normative and practical levels (Barbera, F., (2020) L’innovazione sociale: aspetti concettuali, problematiche metodologiche e implicazioni per l’agenda della ricerca, Polis (ISSN 1120–9488) Fascicolo 1, aprile 2020, Bologna, Il Mulino.). In this regard, the scientific reflection around the concept of circular economy should be studied in relation to how it creates interests, projects, meaning and social reality (Haraway D., (2007), Situated Knowledges. The Science Question in Feminism and The Privilege of Partial Perspective, in Asdal K., et al., 2007, Technoscience The Politics of Interventions, (eds.) Unipub.). Besides, scientific thinking around the concept of circular economy should also be studied in relation to how the plasticity of the concept is able to connect different organizational fields generating new value metrics and quality conventions. We will see how the concept of the circular economy, read through the lens of socio-ecological (Young et al. 2006) and socio-technical (Callon M., Latour B., (1981) Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them to do so, in Knorr Cetina K., Cicourel A.V. (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro and macro sociologies (pp. 277–303), London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.) studies, allows economic issues to be connected with environmental issues and again with issues related to social equity.

Keywords: Circular economy; Doughnut economy; Values; Boundary objects (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-59523-3_3

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031595233

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-59523-3_3

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().