The Reply to Parr

David Reisman ()
Additional contact information
David Reisman: University of Surrey

Chapter Chapter 9 in William Godwin and Thomas Robert Malthus, 2024, pp 183-195 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract James Mackintosh, Samuel Parr and Malthus in the 1790s had all argued that Godwin had exaggerated the case for progress, republicanism and the withering away of the state. The French Revolution had failed. In his Reply (1801) Godwin refuted their key arguments. He continued to defend universal benevolence against those who said (with Adam Smith) that kindliness begins at home with family and friends. Godwin knew that he was frequently regarded as cold and rational. In the Reply he emphasised that emotion and feeling are an essential complement to rational choice. Perhaps reflecting his domestic happiness with Mary Wollstonecraft, he ceased to oppose marriage and the nuclear family despite their implications for property and the intergenerational transmission of privilege. His discussion of social subsistence is a reminder to Malthus that later marriage can be an investment in standing.

Keywords: Mackintosh; Parr; Moral restraint; Benevolence; Emotion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-62113-0_9

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031621130

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-62113-0_9

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().