Undermining Trust in Science: No Fraud Required

Yujia Song () and Maciej Balajewicz ()
Additional contact information
Yujia Song: Salisbury University, Philosophy Department
Maciej Balajewicz: Independent Researcher

A chapter in The Science and Art of Simulation, 2024, pp 255-268 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract In this paper, we caution against a sort of naive trust in science, which assumes that normative standards of scientific inquiry are upheld except in rare cases of fraud or research misconduct. Since scientists are subject to the norms and practices of the institutions that support their work, we need to look beyond individuals’ behavior to examine the institutional contexts that shape the practice of science. This paper probes into two central aspects of the scientific institution as they play out in the U.S.—peer review and grant funding. We argue that problems more pervasive and intractable than outright fraud threaten to undermine trust in science. The push for positive results by journals and funding agencies alike, coupled with institutional pressures to publish, entails a serious misalignment of goals for scientists—the kind of efficiency needed to maximize positive outputs comes at the expense of the time, effort, and discipline that good science calls for.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-68058-8_17

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031680588

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-68058-8_17

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().