Can Emerging Economies Learn Lessons of Institutional Spillover Effect on Financial Development and Economic Growth: Dynamic Spatial Econometric Approach

Kurukulasuriya Dinesh Udana Devindra Fernando () and Nawalage Senevirathe Cooray
Additional contact information
Kurukulasuriya Dinesh Udana Devindra Fernando: Faculty of Management Studies, Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka
Nawalage Senevirathe Cooray: Graduate School of International Relations, International University of Japan

Chapter Chapter 28 in Global Changes and Sustainable Development in Asian Emerging Market Economies: Volume 2, 2024, pp 473-499 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The contemporary environment is interrelated, and interactions between markets, states and international actors at different levels exist in every corner of the globe. The failures of the free-market system have paved the way for institutionalism, which proposes minimising transaction costs, substantial property rights and enabling proper contract enforcement. Most studies on institutions concerning finance–growth relationships are conclusive and inconsistent. This study explores the spatial institutional spillover on financial development and economic growth. The variables of good governance indicators for institutions, the financial development index to measure financial development and per capita gross domestic product (GDP) for economic growth are mainly used in this study. The study explored the spatial impact between countries by the panel data of 153 countries for 2002–2019 using the Dynamic Spatial Econometric Modelling (DSEM) on institutional, spatial implications and spatial institutional impact by the moderation of financial development on growth. Results indicate that the financial development and institutions of surrounding countries create a reverse spatial spillover impact on local countries, governments or areas. However, the institutional moderation impact of financial development has created a spatial spillover between countries. Results concluded that global governance is a positive-sum game; monitoring and governance structures have failed at the international level concerning separate states. To prevent institutional failure at the state level, good governance and links with the global governance structure could disrupt or energise local institutions. The findings may broadly be helpful for the policy makers who are looking into the lessons for market volatilities and uncertainties of emerging economies.

Keywords: Institutions; Dynamic spatial econometric modelling; Global governance; The spillover effect (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-68842-3_28

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031688423

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-68842-3_28

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().