The End of Behavioral Insurance
Glenn W. Harrison ()
Additional contact information
Glenn W. Harrison: Georgia State University
A chapter in Handbook of Insurance, 2025, pp 3-25 from Springer
Abstract:
Abstract Our descriptive understanding of observed insurance behavior has been enhanced by considering alternative modeling approaches, and promises to do the same to our normative evaluation of that behavior. Those alternatives come from the field of behavioral economics, which offers explicit, alternative characterizations of the way in which decisions have been made. The value of these alternatives is clear in a wide range of topics in empirical insurance, to the point where there is now no reason to debate why we need to consider them. Indeed, recognition that behavioral insurance has come to stay in our scholarship allows us to signal the end of the need to even make the case for behavioral insurance. However, that recognition does not mean that every claim from behavioral insurance is to be accepted at face value, and many are dubious or loosely applied. Much remains to be done more carefully, and much simply remains to be done.
Keywords: Behavioral insurance; Behavioral economics; Risk preferences; Intertemporal risk aversion; Subjective beliefs; D01; D9; D81; D83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-69674-9_1
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031696749
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-69674-9_1
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().