Facing Crises: Antifragility, Sustainability, Autopoieticity

Emil Dinga
Additional contact information
Emil Dinga: Romanian Academy

Chapter Chapter 8 in Economic Resilience During Overlapped Crises, 2025, pp 403-442 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This chapter proposes and examines, in an abstract and general way, the “defence lines” of the society (societal system) against the perturbation, namely using robustness, resilience, antifragility, sustainability and autopoieticity, as such concepts were introduced in Chap. 1 . Firstly, of course, it is proved the disturbing signification of the societal generic crisis. More analytical developed are antifragility, sustainability and autopoieticity. A “map” of perturbation compatibility is proposed and examined, based on the logical mark of the generic crisis as advanced in Chap. 2 . In the case of antifragility some detailed analyses are provided regarding the typology of perturbations that a generic societal crisis has the potential to generate. Facing crises is analytically enough examined from the perspective of autopoieticity, a concept relatively rarely convoked in the literature dedicated to societal crises. A proposal is made regarding the concept of recessive perturbation and the procedure to identify (in the abstract case) such a perturbation.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-80224-9_8

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031802249

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-80224-9_8

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().