Who Counts as a Whistleblower? Legal and Academic Debates in France and the United States

Mahaut Fanchini ()
Additional contact information
Mahaut Fanchini: IRG, University of Paris-Est Créteil

Chapter Chapter 3 in Whistleblowing Policy and Practice, Volume II, 2025, pp 25-38 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Who gets to decide who can be labeled as a whistleblower and under which conditions? Recent scholarship has demonstrated that not everyone is granted the status of “valid truth-teller” as gender, race, class, and other dimensions are likely to distinguish whistleblowers. As Lida Maxwell writes concerning Chelsea Manning, “someone who, because she appears queer and improperly gendered, […] cannot be heard as a meaningful, proper public speaker” (Maxwell, 2019). This aspect is a key in whistleblowing accounts, as judicial protection can be granted to those who fit the regulator’s definition. As we already know, whistleblowing is a relational process (Contu, Journal of Management Inquiry 393–406, 2014), and those who listen to whistleblowers take an important part in deciding who and what is meaningful and worth listening to.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-93170-3_3

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031931703

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-93170-3_3

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().