Balancing Historical Authenticity and Modern Inclusivity

Somendra Narayan ()
Additional contact information
Somendra Narayan: University of Amsterdam

Chapter Chapter 5 in The Bridgerton Paradox in Artificial Intelligence, 2025, pp 47-54 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract At the book’s philosophical heart, this chapter probes the tension between faithfully preserving historical records—even if they are exclusionary—and the contemporary imperative to rectify past injustices. It explores postmodernist ideas of multiple narratives and Nagarjunian relational principles, arguing that history is inherently contested and context-dependent. Rather than forcing a choice between authenticity or inclusivity, AI can act as a mediator, juxtaposing conflicting perspectives, maintaining fidelity to documented sources, while also foregrounding the ethical responsibility to recognize marginalized voices.

Keywords: Historical authenticity; Modern inclusivity; Postmodern narratives; Nagarjunian knowledge; Ethical Balancing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-031-99493-7_5

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031994937

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-99493-7_5

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().