Global Policy-Making and Maritime Governance

Michael Roe ()
Additional contact information
Michael Roe: University of Plymouth

Chapter Chapter 4 in The Framework of Maritime Governance, 2026, pp 55-64 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This chapter examines why policy-making and the governance of the maritime sector differs between its domestic and international activities and why this needs to be the case. Efficiency, safety, security and the environment co-exist as central themes for governance both domestically and internationally but thereafter things diverge. Reasons why governance at an international level differs from that at a domestic level include: ignorance and inconsistency which will emerge if individual nation-states each have separately developed policies and governance frameworks, uncoordinated across a global market. the lack of jurisdiction across much of international waters means that domestic policies cannot hope to provide an adequate basis for global shipping. transit is a major part of the international shipping industry and also in accessing ports around the world. The need to cross domestic waters to reach ports, sometimes where this involves crossing other nation-state’s waters, and the significance of passages such as the Bosporus, and the Suez and Panama Canals, present issues that cannot be solved solely and satisfactorily domestically. the ‘Prisoner’s Dilemma’ raises its head as there is a tendency that with ignorance of what others are doing, domestic policy will sink to its lowest standard in order to remain competitive. Instruments to accommodate these needs include multinational and bilateral bodies including the UN and WTO, along with industrial self-regulation and the abrogation of sovereignty exercised by, for example, Egypt over the Suez Canal, and a variety of European countries (Netherlands, Germany, Hungary, Romania) over the Rhine/Danube. A major issue that needs addressing if governance is to be effective internationally is that of jurisdiction and the need for policing. This, along with the need for limited points of application (commonly ports), administrative simplicity, a commitment by the industry and some form of pressure to self-enforce, all underlies the success or otherwise of international maritime governance.

Keywords: Globalisation and maritime governance; Global governance issues; Jurisdiction and policies; Prisoner’s dilemma (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-032-13289-5_4

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783032132895

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-13289-5_4

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().