Stratified analysis?

Karel Hrbacek ()
Additional contact information
Karel Hrbacek: The City College of CUNY, Department of Mathematics

Chapter 4 in The Strength of Nonstandard Analysis, 2007, pp 47-63 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract It is now over forty years since Abraham Robinson realized that “the concepts and methods of Mathematical Logic are capable of providing a suitable framework fur the development of the Differential and Integral Calculus by means of infinitely small and infinitely large numbers” (Robinson [29], Introduction, p. 2). The magnitude of Robinson’s achievement cannot be overstated. Not only does his framework allow rigorous paraphrases of many arguments of Leibniz, Euler and other mathematicians from the classical period of calculus; it has enabled the development of entirely new, important mathematical techniques and constructs not anticipated by the classics. Researchers working with the methods of nonstandard analysis have discovered new significant results in diverse areas of pure and applied mathematics, from number theory to mathematical physics and economics.

Keywords: Stratify Analysis; Axiomatic System; Standard Function; Relative Standardness; Nonstandard Analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-211-49905-4_4

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783211499054

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-49905-4_4

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().