 Multifidelity Uncertainty Quantification Using Spectral Stochastic Discrepancy ModelsMichael S. Eldred (),
Leo W. T. Ng (),
Matthew F. Barone () and
Stefan P. Domino ()
Chapter 28 in Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification, 2017, pp 991-1036 from Springer Abstract: Abstract When faced with a restrictive evaluation budget that is typical of today’s high-fidelity simulation models, the effective exploitation of lower-fidelity alternatives within the uncertainty quantification (UQ) process becomes critically important. Herein, we explore the use of multifidelity modeling within UQ, for which we rigorously combine information from multiple simulation-based models within a hierarchy of fidelity, in seeking accurate high-fidelity statistics at lower computational cost. Motivated by correction functions that enable the provable convergence of a multifidelity optimization approach to an optimal high-fidelity point solution, we extend these ideas to discrepancy modeling within a stochastic domain and seek convergence of a multifidelity uncertainty quantification process to globally integrated high-fidelity statistics. For constructing stochastic models of both the low-fidelity model and the model discrepancy, we employ stochastic expansion methods (non-intrusive polynomial chaos and stochastic collocation) computed by integration/interpolation on structured sparse grids or regularized regression on unstructured grids. We seek to employ a coarsely resolved grid for the discrepancy in combination with a more finely resolved grid for the low-fidelity model. The resolutions of these grids may be defined statically or determined through uniform and adaptive refinement processes. Adaptive refinement is particularly attractive, as it has the ability to preferentially target stochastic regions where the model discrepancy becomes more complex, i.e., where the predictive capabilities of the low-fidelity model start to break down and greater reliance on the high-fidelity model (via the discrepancy) is necessary. These adaptive refinement processes can either be performed separately for the different grids or within a coordinated multifidelity algorithm. In particular, we present an adaptive greedy multifidelity approach in which we extend the generalized sparse grid concept to consider candidate index set refinements drawn from multiple sparse grids, as governed by induced changes in the statistical quantities of interest and normalized by relative computational cost. Through a series of numerical experiments using statically defined sparse grids, adaptive multifidelity sparse grids, and multifidelity compressed sensing, we demonstrate that the multifidelity UQ process converges more rapidly than a single-fidelity UQ in cases where the variance of the discrepancy is reduced relative to the variance of the high-fidelity model (resulting in reductions in initial stochastic error), where the spectrum of the expansion coefficients of the model discrepancy decays more rapidly than that of the high-fidelity model (resulting in accelerated convergence rates), and/or where the discrepancy is more sparse than the high-fidelity model (requiring the recovery of fewer significant terms). Keywords: Multifidelity; Uncertainty quantification; Discrepancy model; Polynomial chaos; Stochastic collocation; Sparse grid; Compressed sensing; Wind turbine (search for similar items in EconPapers) There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-12385-1_25 Ordering information: This item can be ordered from DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12385-1_25 Access Statistics for this chapter More chapters in Springer Books from Springer |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.