Decision Analytic and Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification for Decision Support

D. Warner North ()
Additional contact information
D. Warner North: NorthWorks

Chapter 40 in Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification, 2017, pp 1361-1399 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This essay introduces probability in support of decision-making, as a state of mind and not of things. Probability provides a framework for reasoning coherently about uncertainty. According to Cox’s theorem, it is the only way to reason coherently about uncertainty. Probability summarizes states of information. A basic desideratum is that states of information judged equivalent should lead to the same probability distributions. Some widely used probabilistic models have both sufficient statistics and maximum entropy characterizations. In practice, outside of certain physics and engineering applications, human judgment is usually needed to quantify uncertainty as probabilities. Reality is highly complex, but one can test judgments against what is known, drawing upon many specialized areas of human knowledge. Sensitivity analysis can evaluate the importance of multiple uncertainties in a decision context. When the choice between alternatives is close, what is the value of further information (VOI)? Important concepts discussed in this chapter are the expected value of perfect information and the expected value of further experimental testing. Practical application is illustrated in two case studies. The first involves assessing the probability for replication of a terrestrial microbe on Mars, in the decision context of a constraint on planetary exploration. The second involves weather modification of hurricanes/typhoons: whether to deploy this technology to reduce damage from hurricanes impacting US coastal areas and valuing experimental testing offshore. The decision context is that of a natural disaster turned political by deployment of new technology where such deployment might be followed by a reduction, or by an increase, in adverse impacts, compared to not deploying the technology. Decision support should be viewed as an iterative process of working with those with decision responsibility and with experts who are the best available sources of information. The decision support process includes characterizing uncertainties and values for outcomes in the context of a choice among decision alternatives. Sensitivity analysis and VOI can give insight on whether to act now or to seek more information and more refined analysis. In a public policy decision context, the process can facilitate stakeholders sharing and critiquing information as the basis for characterizing uncertainties and learning which uncertainties and value judgments are most important for decisions.

Keywords: Bayes’ theorem; Decision analysis; Value of information (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-12385-1_41

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319123851

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12385-1_41

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().