Are Free Trade Agreements Always Beneficial?

Paul Davidson

Chapter Chapter 9 in Who's Afraid of John Maynard Keynes?, 2017, pp 127-140 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Free trade agreements such as NAFTA are based on a 19th century conclusion of classical theory entitled the law of comparative advantage. If free trade is permitted classical theory states each nation should specialize in particular industry in which it had a comparative cost advantage and the result will be global full employment and more goods and services available for everyone. The Keynes theory argues that comparative advantage is only applicable for foreign trade in minerals and climate affected industries such as agriculture. For all mass production manufacturing industries, free trade favors nations that do not treat its workers in a civilized manner but instead production occurs under “sweatshop” conditions. Free trade in manufacturing industries is destructive to prosperity and full employment conditions in developed nations Poicies are necessary to prevent free trade if production occurs in foreirgn factories under “sweatshop” conditions.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-64504-9_9

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319645049

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-64504-9_9

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().