EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

On the Myriad Mathematical Traditions of Ancient Greece

David E. Rowe
Additional contact information
David E. Rowe: Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Institut für Mathematik

Chapter 30 in A Richer Picture of Mathematics, 2018, pp 369-374 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract To exert one’s historical imagination is to plunge into delicate deliberations that involve personal judgments and tastes. Historians can and do argue like lawyers, but their arguments are often made on behalf of a picture of the past, and these historical images obviously change over time. Why should the history of mathematics be any different? When we imagine the world of ancient Greek mathematics, the works of Euclid (Heath 1926), Archimedes (Heath 1897b), and Apollonius (Heath 1897a) easily spring to mind. Throughout most of the twentieth century, our dominant image of Greek mathematical traditions has been shaped by the high standards of rigor and creative achievement that are purportedly found in extant texts presumed to have been written by these three famous authors. Thanks to the efforts of Thomas Little Heath, the English-speaking world has long enjoyed easy access to this trio’s major works and much else besides (Heath 1921). Yet despite this plentiful source material, our conventional picture of Greek mathematics has largely been sustained by a far smaller corpus of knowledge. Our image of Greek geometry, as conveyed in countless mathematical texts and most books on the history of mathematics, has tended to stress the formal structure and methodological sophistication found in a handful of canonical works or, more accurately, selected portions of the same. Even the first two books of Euclid’s Elements – which concern the congruence properties of rectilineal figures and culminate in theorem II-14 showing how to square such a figure – have often been trivialized. Many writers have distilled their content down to a few definitions, postulates, and elementary propositions intended merely to illustrate the axiomatic-deductive method in classical geometry.

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-67819-1_30

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319678191

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67819-1_30

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-11-21
Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-67819-1_30