Is (Was) Mathematics an Art or a Science?

David E. Rowe
Additional contact information
David E. Rowe: Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Institut für Mathematik

Chapter 34 in A Richer Picture of Mathematics, 2018, pp 407-411 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract If you teach in a department like mine, the answer to this timeless question may actually carry consequences that seriously affect the resources your program will have available to teach mathematics in the future. In Mainz, no one is likely to protest that mathematics has long been counted as part of the Naturwissenschaften (natural sciences). If it were part of the Geisteswissenschaften (humanities), this would probably have serious budgetary implications. Of course most mathematics departments are now facing a far more immediate and pressing issue, one that can perhaps be boiled down to a different question: is mathematics closer to (a) an art form or (b) a form of computer science? If your students think the answer is certainly (b), then you can dismiss the above query as irrelevant for higher education in the twenty-first century. But since I’m mainly concerned with historical matters, let me turn to the loftier issue raised by the (parenthetical) question in the title above.

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-67819-1_34

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319678191

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67819-1_34

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().