EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Consumer (Co-)Ownership in Renewables in California (USA)

Felicia Tulder (), Sharon Klein and Erika Morgan
Additional contact information
Felicia Tulder: European University Viadrina
Sharon Klein: University of Maine
Erika Morgan: Energetic Management Associates

Chapter 21 in Energy Transition, 2019, pp 479-506 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract There were and are only a few support policies focusing directly on consumer (co-)ownership. California Senate Bill 1 of 2006 set a renewable distributed generation target of 12 GW installed capacity by 2020, which included 3 GW for self-generation to be realized through the California Solar Initiative. California is one of 17 US states with a virtual net metering policy which, however, is restricted to adjacent or contiguous properties, unlike other states that allow aggregation within a utility territory. CCAs there is no opportunity for consumer ownership, no sharing of tax credits, no consumer involvement in pricing, governance or project-related decisions. California’s Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) model adopted in 2002 empowered municipalities and other units of government, that is, counties, and associations of cities, counties and other public entities, to take control of the procurement of electricity supply in their territory. CCAs can also incentivise consumer-owned RES with enhanced NEM and/or FITs and have the potential to offer additional financing options. All California’s operating CCAs state the goal of progressively increasing their ownership of RE plants to meet their customers’ requirements for renewable electricity supply. More general, participation in RE projects is possible via any available type of corporation, partnership or individual business activity, similar to those in other countries. Cooperatives as a legal vehicle are available but not common. Investments in solar collectors and photovoltaic installations on private buildings, often facilitated by municipalities making use of state financing programs, are gaining in popularity.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-93518-8_21

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319935188

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93518-8_21

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-02
Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-93518-8_21