EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Galois Descent and Generic Splitting Fields

Nathan Jacobson
Additional contact information
Nathan Jacobson: Yale University

Chapter III in Finite-Dimensional Division Algebras over Fields, 1996, pp 95-153 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Let A be a central simple algebra over F split by a finite dimensional Galois extension field E/F with Galois group G. Then E ⊗ F A=EndE V where V is a vector space over E of dimensionality the degree m of A/F. If σ∈G, σ determines the automorphism α σ of EndE V that is the identity on A and is σ on E. The α σ form a group and it is clear that A=Inv α the set of fixed points of the α σ. Thus A can be obtained by “Galois descent” from the split central simple algebra EndE V. Now α σ has the form $\ell \rightsquigarrow u_{\sigma}\ell u_{\sigma}^{-1}$ where u σ is a σ-semilinear transformation of V and since u σ is determined up to a multiplier in E * we have u σ u τ=k σ,τ u στ for k σ,τ∈E *. Then the k σ,τ constitute a factor set k from G to E *. The u σ can be used to define a transcendental extension field F m(k) of F in the following way. Let E(ξ)=E(ξ 1,…,ξ m) where the ξ i are indeterminates and identify the E-subspace ΣE ξ i of E(ξ) with V=ΣEx i, (x 1,…,x m) a base for V/E. Then the u σ, can be regarded as semilinear transformations of ΣE ξ i and u σ has a unique extension to an automorphism η(σ) of E(ξ)/F such that η(σ)∣E=σ. This restricts to an automorphism η(σ)0 of the subfield E(ξ)0 of rational functions that are homogeneous of degree 0 in the sense that they are quotients of homogeneous polynomials in the ξ’s of the same degree. We have η(σ)0 η(τ)0=η(σ τ)0 (but not η(σ)η(τ)=η(σ τ)). Hence we have the subfield F m(k)=Inv η(G)0 which we call a Brauer field of the central simple algebra A. The field F m(k) is a generic splitting field for A in a sense defined in Section 3.8. Such fields were first studied for quaternion algebras by Witt ([34]) and for arbitrary central simple algebras by Amitsur ([55] and [56]). Further results and a simplification of the theory are due to Roquette ([63] and [64]).

Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-02429-0_3

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783642024290

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02429-0_3

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-12-11
Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-02429-0_3