Rationality of Final Decisions Leads to Sequential Equilibrium
Ryuichiro Ishikawa () and
Takashi Matsuhisa ()
Additional contact information
Ryuichiro Ishikawa: Hitotsubashi University, Graduate School of Economics
Takashi Matsuhisa: Ibaraki National College of Technology, Department of Liberal Arts and Sciences
A chapter in ICM Millennium Lectures on Games, 2003, pp 193-204 from Springer
Abstract:
Summary This article investigateS epistemic conditions for a sequential equilibrium in an extensive form game with imperfect information: If players mutually know that all players maximize own expected payoffs for any information sets in their final decisions, then their behaviors with belief yield a sequential equilibrium. This result is an extension of [2] in a perfect information game In this article, we propose the notion of μ-rationality, by which we mean that player knows that he maximizes his own payoff according to the common-belief μ. We also introduce the notion of μ-consistency in imperfect information game. Our main theorem states that mutual knowledge of both μ-rationality and μ-consistency induces a sequential equilibrium outcome in an extensive form game.
Keywords: Knowledge; Rationality; epistemic conditions; backward induction; sequential equilibrium (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-662-05219-8_12
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783662052198
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-05219-8_12
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().