Allocation Proportion of Reward-Penalty Mechanism on Electronic Product Reverse Supply Chain

Wenbin Wang (), Shuai Yang (), Mingbao Cheng () and Zuqing Huang ()
Additional contact information
Wenbin Wang: China University of Mining and Technology
Shuai Yang: China University of Mining and Technology
Mingbao Cheng: Guangdong University of Technology
Zuqing Huang: China Jiliang University

A chapter in LISS 2014, 2015, pp 1281-1289 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract We study the allocation proportion problem of reward-penalty mechanism (RPM) on reverse supply chain (RSC) in equilibrium and get following conclusions: the allocation proportion of recyclers is always more than that of manufacturers under the RPM; the difficulty coefficients for the collection of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) and the target recycle rate are positively correlated with the allocation proportional coefficients, while the reward and penalty degree has negative correlation with the same coefficient; the recycle rate increases in the RPM, meanwhile the buy-back price of WEEE increases while the new product’s price decreases; too high target recycle rate will inhibit the collection rate from increasing.

Keywords: WEEE; RSC; Collection; RPM; Allocation proportion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-662-43871-8_186

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783662438718

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-43871-8_186

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().