Capitum Selectum: Post-Hoc Analysis in Clinical Trials, a Case for Logistic Regression Analysis

Ton J. Cleophas, Aeilko H. Zwinderman and Toine F. Cleophas
Additional contact information
Ton J. Cleophas: European Interuniversity College of Pharmaceutical Medicine Lyon, Dept Medicine Albert Schweitzer Hospital Dordrecht
Aeilko H. Zwinderman: Dept Statistics Academic Hospital Leiden
Toine F. Cleophas: Technical University

Chapter Chapter 11 in Statistics Applied to Clinical Trials, 2000, pp 88-91 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Multivariate methods are used to adjust asymmetries in the patient characteristics in a trial. It can also be used for a subsequent purpose. In many trials simple primary hypotheses in terms of efficacy and safety expectations, are tested through their respective outcome variables as described in the protocol. However, sometimes it is decided already at the design stage that post hoc analyses will be performed for the purpose of testing secondary hypotheses. E.g., suppose we first want to know whether a novel beta-blocker is better than a standard betablocker, and second, if so, whether this better effect is due to a vasodilatory property of the novel compound. The first hypothesis is assessed in the primary (univariate) analysis. For the second hypothesis, we can simply adjust the two treatment groups for difference in vasodilation by multiple regression analysis and see whether differences in treatment effects otherwise are affected by this procedure. However, with small data power is lost by such procedure. More power is provided by the following approach. We could assign all of the patients to two new groups: patients who actually have improvement in the primary outcome variable and those who have not, irrespective of the type of beta-blocker. We, then, can perform a regression analyis of the two new groups trying to find independent determinants of this improvement. If one or more determinants for adjustment are binary, which is generally so, our choice of test is logistic regression analysis. Testing the second hypothesis is, of course, of lower validity than testing the first one, because it is post-hoc and makes use of a regression analysis which does not differentiate between causal relationships and relationships due to an unknown common factor.

Keywords: Logistic Regression; Calcium Channel Blocker; Angina Pectoris; Peripheral Vascular Resistance; Rate Pressure Product (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-94-015-9508-7_11

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9789401595087

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-9508-7_11

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().