EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Is a Low and Fixed Price for Mitigation Credits Effective in Reducing Deforestation Emissions?

Fiona Ryan
Additional contact information
Fiona Ryan: Independent Scholar

A chapter in Community Empowerment, Sustainable Cities, and Transformative Economies, 2022, pp 191-209 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) involves payments for emissions reduction in terms of tonnes of Carbon known as Results-Based Payments (RBP). RBPs were envisaged as covering the opportunity and transaction/implementation costs of not converting the forest to other land uses such as oil palm or beef production by providing alternative development pathways. Most REDD+ funding has come from official development assistance (ODA) where funders have benchmarked payments for results at US$ 5/tCO2-e or sometimes US$ 10/tCO2-e. These prices are far below most estimates of the net costs of ending deforestation. Despite REDD+ being designed to fit into an international emissions trading context, the international environment makes it uncertain that international emissions trading under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement will generate a price for REDD+ RBPs necessary to meet the costs of reducing emissions in developing countries. The study examines the peer-reviewed literature and materials produced by various stakeholders on low and fixed benchmark prices for REDD+ RBPs and will conduct a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) analysis to determine likely outcomes. It concludes that low prices for REDD+ RBPs will substantially continue deforestation because of loss of country ownership, loss of stakeholder support for an alternative development pathway, and shifting of the burden of emissions reduction to developing countries. Low fixed prices result in serious equity and justice concerns for people in tropical forest countries. In the absence of a viable compliance market for REDD+, greater expenditure on REDD+ RBPs is justified, in particular, because it enables a higher price for RBPs.

Keywords: REDD+; Climate change; Results-based-payments; Carbon pricing; Deforestation; Development assistance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-16-5260-8_12

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9789811652608

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-5260-8_12

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-02
Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-16-5260-8_12