Stereotype Threat Experiences Across Social Groups

Valerie Jones Taylor (vjtaylor@lehigh.edu), C. Finn Siepser, Juan José Valladares and Rita Knasel
Additional contact information
Valerie Jones Taylor: Lehigh University
C. Finn Siepser: Lehigh University
Juan José Valladares: Lehigh University
Rita Knasel: Lehigh University

Chapter 37 in Handbook on Economics of Discrimination and Affirmative Action, 2023, pp 841-865 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This chapter argues that stereotype threat theory (Steele et al., 2002) can demystify the relationship between experiences of discrimination, identity (e.g., race/ethnicity, gender), and perceptions of affirmative action (AA) and related policy (AAP). Following the failure of anti-discrimination laws in the US, the federal government instituted affirmative action policies (1964–1967), or “proactive approaches” designed to redress centuries of de jure and de facto discrimination toward historically marginalized groups. Since their inception, AAPs in education and employment have become increasingly misunderstood and controversial, while debates about their fairness, efficacy, and implementation abound. Stereotype threat theory can inform divergent understandings of AA and AAPs by delineating a framework that explains how and why concerns about being judged through the lens of negative group-based stereotypes can impact cognition and behavior for historically marginalized and privileged groups (i.e., assumed affirmative action beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries). After defining discrimination and affirmative action in the US historical context, this chapter illustrates the various stereotype threat-related concerns AAPs may raise for people from different social groups who have disparate experiences with discrimination. Next, findings from stereotype threat research and its relationship to affirmative action perceptions are reviewed to demonstrate that properly implemented and effectively communicated AAPs are critical in reducing the threat associated with them. Integrating insights from stereotype threat theory, the chapter concludes by advocating for (a) education on critical historical knowledge about discrimination and AAPs, (b) accurate and strategic AAP messaging, and (c) renewed commitments to instituting evidence-based AAPs to reduce systemic group-based discrimination.

Keywords: Stereotype threat; Affirmative action; Affirmative action policy; Discrimination; Identity-safe environments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-19-4166-5_6

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9789811941665

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-4166-5_6

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla (sonal.shukla@springer.com) and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (indexing@springernature.com).