Industry and Idleness

Hye-Joon Yoon ()
Additional contact information
Hye-Joon Yoon: Yonsei University

Chapter Chapter 3 in Moral Discourses of the Economy in Eighteenth-Century Britain, 2025, pp 69-110 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This chapter deals with the supremely important dichotomy of “industry” and “idleness,” which served as the ever-reliable criterion of moral, religious, economic, and even legal judgments throughout the century. For virtually all authors, regardless of their political or religious stances, “industry” was regarded as a sacrosanct virtue, frequently placed in sharp opposition to the universally proscribed vice of “idleness.” “Industry,” which served at once as a moral term denoting voluntary diligence and an economic term referring to productive labor, was to be encouraged and extolled under all circumstances. By contrast, “idleness,” an equally potent compound of moral and economic significations, was invariably condemned, as it was identified as the real cause of social and economic misery individuals suffer. The vast dominion the dichotomy reigned over is traced all the way to the dark recesses of the debtors’ prison, where the industrious and the idle insolvents ought to have been but were not always neatly differentiated.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-95-0958-4_3

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9789819509584

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-95-0958-4_3

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Books from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().