 Public-Private Partnership and Government DebtWeijie Luo ()
Chapter Chapter 8 in Public-Private Partnership and Policy Uncertainty, 2025, pp 129-153 from Springer Abstract: Abstract This study analyzes how local governments use external financing instruments to adjust their capital structure. External financing instruments (public debt and public-private partnership [PPP]) have become critical options for most local governments to deal with budget constraints. We construct an indicator of the external financing ratio (EFR) to measure local governments’ dependency on external financing instruments. Based on the pecking order and trade-off capital structure theories, we utilize city-level panel data in China between 2015 and 2019 to investigate the financing strategies of local governments. We report two main findings. First, the financing strategies of China’s local governments follow the pecking order theory. In other words, internal financing has priority over debt and then PPP. Second, consistent with the trade-off theory, China’s local governments continuously adjust to a target EFR. In addition, compared with debt financing, the adjustment of PPP financing is relatively inelastic. Our study emphasizes the importance of public financial management reinforced by local governments to prevent fiscal risks in the context of intensified financial stress. Date: 2025 There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-96-8074-0_8 Ordering information: This item can be ordered from DOI: 10.1007/978-981-96-8074-0_8 Access Statistics for this chapter More chapters in Springer Books from Springer |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.