 Health Systems of the WorldSyed Amin Tabish
Chapter Chapter 1 in Health Care Management: Principles and Practice, 2024, pp 3-27 from Springer Abstract: Abstract Health systems are intricate webs of organizations, institutions, and resources, all working toward the common goal of improving health outcomes within resource constraints. When comparing health care systems across different countries, we gain valuable insights into their performance and areas for improvement. There are four main types of health care systems globally: Beveridge Model: used in the UK and some European countries, where health care is publicly funded and provided by the government. Bismarck Model: found in countries like Germany and Switzerland, combining private insurance with employer-based coverage. National Health Insurance Model: used in Canada and Japan, with government-funded insurance but private providers. Out-of-Pocket Model: common in low-income countries, where individuals pay directly for health services. Health systems exhibit significant variations in accessibility, quality, and cost management. Each system has its unique strengths and weaknesses. Due to diverse combinations of components, health care systems differ significantly by country and region, making it challenging to definitively identify the world’s best health care system. The public health infrastructure of a nation plays a crucial role in ensuring the welfare and security of its population. It encompasses responses to infectious diseases, monitoring environmental health risks, managing chronic illnesses, and promoting overall wellness. The state of a nation’s public health system serves as a significant indicator of its well-being and quality of life. Evaluating public health system performance involves measuring each component and understanding their interrelationships. Key indicators include healthcare infrastructure, professional competencies (such as doctors, nurses, and other health workers), annual per capita costs in USD, availability of quality medications, and government readiness. Access to healthcare is considered a fundamental human right by many people and governments. Individuals lacking quality healthcare often experience lower life expectancy and a diminished quality of life compared to those with stable, accessible, and affordable healthcare systems. Countries with efficient and effective healthcare systems generally achieve better health outcomes. Quality healthcare is assessed based on factors such as care processes (including preventive measures, safe care, coordination, and patient engagement), access (affordability and timeliness), administrative efficiency, equity, and healthcare outcomes (population health, mortality amenable to healthcare, and disease-specific outcomes). While identifying an exemplary healthcare system is challenging due to complexity, several factors contribute to effectiveness. Health-focused organizations continue to seek the optimal system despite ongoing debates about key factors and the ideal model. The ten countries with the most well-developed public health systems include Sweden, Canada, Finland, Denmark, Norway, Switzerland, Germany, Australia, the United Kingdom, and Belgium. Date: 2024 There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-981-97-3879-3_1 Ordering information: This item can be ordered from DOI: 10.1007/978-981-97-3879-3_1 Access Statistics for this chapter More chapters in Springer Books from Springer |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.