Chapter 9: Due Diligence and the Profit Motive: Perfect or Imperfect Duty?

Richard M. Robinson
Additional contact information
Richard M. Robinson: SUNY Fredonia

A chapter in Business Ethics: Kant, Virtue, and the Nexus of Duty, 2022, pp 157-175 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The pursuit of shareholder wealth is not a contractual obligation of management, and therefore not a perfect duty. It is an imperfect duty that has practical limits that result from its tradeoffs with other imperfect duties of due diligence. These imperfect duties of managerial due diligence are illustrated here through explanations of basic financial decisions: capital budgeting (the selection of long-term projects of the firm), capital structure (the selection of finance sources), and liquidity management. The ethical foundations of these imperfect duties of due diligence are drawn from Rawls’ criteria for “competent moral judges” and “considered moral judgements.” These are shown to depend on the imperfect duties to gather and utilize relevant knowledge as explained in Chapters “The Moral Construction Process and Duties” and “Moral Virtues and Ethical Decisions”.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:sptchp:978-3-030-85997-8_9

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030859978

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-85997-8_9

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Springer Texts in Business and Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().