Do Reproductive Attitudes and Knowledge Explain Race-Ethnic-Nativity Differences in Unintended Fertility?

Karen Benjamin Guzzo (), Sarah R. Hayford () and Vanessa Wanner Lang ()
Additional contact information
Karen Benjamin Guzzo: Bowling Green State University, Department of Sociology
Sarah R. Hayford: Bowling Green State University, Department of Sociology
Vanessa Wanner Lang: Bowling Green State University, Department of Sociology

Chapter Chapter 6 in Analyzing Contemporary Fertility, 2020, pp 91-132 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract One oft-suggested explanation for higher unintended fertility among racialized minorities is that they have less accurate reproductive knowledge and hold different attitudes about having children under various circumstances relative to non-Hispanic Whites. However, testing this explanation is challenging because it is unclear how to identify and measure relevant elements of attitudes and knowledge. In this paper, we make two key contributions to address this challenge. First, we test whether different indicators of reproductive attitudes and knowledge explain race-ethnic-nativity differences in unintended fertility, using the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. We compare models using individual items and models using latent factors derived in prior research. Although both individual items and factors measuring attitudes and knowledge vary by race-ethnicity-nativity, few indicators significantly predict unintended fertility in the expected direction, and race-ethnic-nativity differences remain statistically significant after controlling for these indicators. Second, we assess whether the previously-developed factor structure fits equally well across different race-ethnic-nativity groups, Using factor analytic techniques, we show that reproductive attitudinal and knowledge factors do not hold equally well across race-ethnicity-nativity, suggesting that attitudinal and knowledge measures may tap into different underlying concepts across sub-populations and thus have limited utility for explaining group differences.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ssdmcp:978-3-030-48519-1_6

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030485191

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-48519-1_6

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().