Religious Paradox or Political Divide? The Intersection of Religion, Politics, and Place of Marriage in the U.S

Krista K. Westrick-Payne () and Lee Brady
Additional contact information
Krista K. Westrick-Payne: Bowling Green State University, Department of Sociology
Lee Brady: Bowling Green State University, Department of Sociology

Chapter Chapter 8 in Advances in Social Demography, 2025, pp 161-202 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract This chapter explores the “religious paradox or political divide” in marriage and divorce patterns across the United States, examining the intersection of religion, politics, and place. Using the Theory of Conjunctural Action (TCA) as a guiding framework, we analyze county-level data from the National Center for Family and Marriage Research Marriage and Divorce Data Compass for 2019. The findings reveal a nuanced landscape where religious climate and political contexts shape marital behaviors. Some religious traditions are associated with both high marriage and high divorce rates, illustrating a religious paradox. However, religious homogamy within counties reduces divorce rates, suggesting shared affiliation fosters marital stability. Political climate reveals a divide: conservative regions exhibit high marriage and high divorce rates, while less conservative regions show higher selectivity into marriage. However this relationship is sensitive to economic and sociodemographic factors. These patterns suggest an interplay between structural and cultural factors, where religious and political contexts interact with counties’ sociodemographic characteristics to shape outcomes. By employing TCA, the study links individual behaviors to broader structural and cultural conditions, emphasizing the contextual and dynamic nature of marital decisions. These findings challenge simplistic narratives attributing marital behavior to single factors like religion or politics. Instead, they highlight the need for multifaceted policy approaches that address the interplay of economic conditions, cultural norms, and demographic contexts. Such an approach is critical for supporting family stability in an evolving societal landscape where religion, politics, and place intersect in complex ways.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ssdmcp:978-3-031-89737-5_8

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031897375

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-89737-5_8

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().