Index Bias and Current Practices

Mark Fossett
Additional contact information
Mark Fossett: Texas A&M University, Department of Sociology

Chapter Chapter 14 in New Methods for Measuring and Analyzing Segregation, 2017, pp 211-236 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Standard versions of indices of uneven distribution take their minimum value of zero only under the condition of exact even distribution. Most segregation researchers and consumers of segregation studies are habituated to accepting this benchmark for social integration. On reflection, however, it is an unusual point of reference for assessing segregation. For one thing, exact even distribution usually is not logically possible because individuals, families, and households cannot be distributed in fractional parts as almost always is needed to achieve exact even distribution. The resulting departure from uneven distribution is likely to be negligible when segregation is being assessed for broad group comparison using relatively large spatial units such as census tracts. But it will be non-negligible when measuring segregation for small groups and/or when using small spatial units such as blocks.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:ssdmcp:978-3-319-41304-4_14

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783319413044

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41304-4_14

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().