Analysis of the 2013 German Bundestag Election

Andranik Tangian
Additional contact information
Andranik Tangian: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

Chapter Chapter 13 in Analytical Theory of Democracy, 2020, pp 527-579 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract The 2013 German Bundestag election is analyzed in the same way as the 2017 Bundestag election is analyzed in Chapter 8. The positions of 28 German parties on 38 topical policy issues are compared with the statistics of relevant public opinion polls. The results are summarized in the indices of popularity (the average percentage of the population represented) and universality (frequency of representing a majority) at both the party and the coalition levels. We show that the election winners are not the best representatives of public opinion, whereas the best representatives receive too few votes to be allocated Bundestag seats. Since the same problem is inherent in the 2009, 2013 and 2017 Bundestag elections, we conclude that such an election failure is not occasional but appears to have a systemic character. To overcome it, the Third Vote method introduced in Chapter 10 is applied to hypothetically reallocate the Bundestag seats, resulting, as previously, in a significant gain in the Bundestag’s representativeness.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:stcchp:978-3-030-39691-6_13

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030396916

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39691-6_13

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Studies in Choice and Welfare from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().