Building Bridges Over the Great Divide

Hannu Nurmi ()
Additional contact information
Hannu Nurmi: Contemporary History and Political Science, University of Turku

A chapter in Advances in Collective Decision Making, 2023, pp 9-24 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract We discuss some methods aiming to reconcile Borda’s and Condorcet’s winning intuitions in the theory of voting. We begin with a brief summary of the advantages and disadvantages of binary and positional voting rules. We then review in some detail Black’s, Nanson’s and Dodgson’s rules as well as the relatively recently introduced methods based on supercovering relation over the candidate set. These are evaluated in terms of some well-known choice–theoretic criteria.

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:stcchp:978-3-031-21696-1_2

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031216961

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-21696-1_2

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Studies in Choice and Welfare from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().