Consent or Coercion? A Critical Analysis of the Constitutional Contract

Randall Holcombe

Chapter Chapter 2 in Constitutional Mythologies, 2011, pp 9-23 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Humans are social creatures, and any social organization requires an understanding among its members about how individuals in the society interact, what their obligations are to fellow members of society, and what they can expect from others. This understanding is the social contract. The social contract is universal, in that as far back as history can trace, and in every place around the world, humans have always lived in groups and have always worked cooperatively. Constitutions are a formalization of the parts of the social contract that specify what obligations the group compels from its members, and what rights group members are entitled to in return. In contrast to the Constitutional contract, social norms are a part of the social contract that conveys behavioral expectations, but without a formal set of sanctions for those who do not conform.

Keywords: Social Contract; Government Action; Constitutional Rule; Social Contract Theory; Strong Person (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:stpchp:978-1-4419-6784-8_2

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9781441967848

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6784-8_2

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Studies in Public Choice from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().