How We (Should?) Study Congress and History
Sarah Binder ()
Additional contact information
Sarah Binder: George Washington University
A chapter in Causal Inference and American Political Development, 2024, pp 189-203 from Springer
Abstract:
Abstract Applying an array of quasiexperimental designs, proponents of causal inference approaches to studying American politics are setting their sights on the study of Congress. In many ways, that focus makes sense, improved research design allows us to draw stronger analytical inferences from observational data, bolstering our understanding of legislative politics. But are the pursuit and methods of causal inference equally well suited to the study of Congress and history? In this chapter, I consider the application of causal inference methods in historically oriented studies of Congress. Drawing from my coauthored work on the interdependence of Congress and the Federal Reserve over the Fed’s first century and earlier work on the institutional evolution of Congress, I point to the trade-offs between knowledge and certainty that are endemic in causal inference approaches—and arguably especially so in the study of Congress and history.
Keywords: Congress; History; Federal Reserve; Monetary politics; N00; H00; G28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:stpchp:978-3-031-74913-1_10
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783031749131
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-74913-1_10
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Studies in Public Choice from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().