ETOEs—Arbitrageurs or Vehicles of Change in Postal Liberalization?

Joy M. Leong, Daniel Bahar and Dimosthenis Papakrivopoulos
Additional contact information
Joy M. Leong: Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP
Daniel Bahar: Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP
Dimosthenis Papakrivopoulos: Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP

Chapter Chapter 12 in Regulatory and Economic Challenges in the Postal and Delivery Sector, 2005, pp 243-258 from Springer

Abstract: 6. Conclusion The UPU should move away from a monopoly orientation, which perceives the proliferation of ETOEs only as a temporary aberration and a threat to universal service. Instead, the UPU should embrace a more economically efficient terminal dues structure that will correct non-cost-based discrimination, place the UPU in a position to lead the way to a competitive global postal market, and allow ETOEs to play a significant role in the growth of liberalized postal administrations.

Keywords: European Union; World Trade Organization; European Union Member State; Postal Service; Postal Administration (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:topchp:978-0-387-23637-7_12

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9780387236377

DOI: 10.1007/0-387-23637-6_12

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().