Mining the Role of Design Reflection and Associated Brain Dynamics in Creativity

Neeraj Sonalkar (), Sahar Jahanikia (), Hua Xie (), Caleb Geniesse (), Rafi Ayub, Roger Beaty () and Manish Saggar ()
Additional contact information
Neeraj Sonalkar: Center for Design Research, Stanford University
Sahar Jahanikia: Stanford University School of Medicine
Hua Xie: OHSU Center for Regenerative Medicine
Caleb Geniesse: Stanford University School of Medicine
Rafi Ayub: Stanford University School of Medicine
Roger Beaty: The Pennsylvania State University
Manish Saggar: Stanford University School of Medicine

A chapter in Design Thinking Research, 2020, pp 155-167 from Springer

Abstract: Abstract Reflection—the activity of reasoning through an action that has occurred—has been shown to be of importance to the development of design expertise. Although design reflection has been widely studied previously, several gaps in the knowledge still exist. First, previous work in design reflection has been mostly limited to descriptive and prescriptive research, while very few researchers investigated the effect of design reflection on performance of individuals and teams. Second, previous researchers limited the study of reflection to the language used and its reference to the design problem or solution space. Third, previous work on design reflection has not taken into account the antagonist of reflection—i.e., rumination. Rumination is characterized as repetitive and persistent evaluation of the meaning, causes, and consequences of one’s affective state and personal concerns, and has been shown to negatively affect creativity and problem solving. In this project, we planned to address these limitations by (1) assessing the effects of different types of reflection on creative performance; (2) going beyond the frontier of language (or speech) and additionally investigating the role of brain and interaction dynamics during design reflection; and (3) including psychological construct of rumination in addition to reflection. We hypothesized that given the critical importance of reflection in design thinking, our approach will provide a comprehensive understanding of the interplay between brain dynamics, design reflection, and creativity.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:undchp:978-3-030-28960-7_10

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/9783030289607

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-28960-7_10

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Understanding Innovation from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().