Financial Crisis: Lessons from Different Management Approaches

Blu Putnam

Chapter 15 in Economics Gone Astray, 2019, pp 197-217 from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.

Abstract: After the financial panic of September 2008 and the recession that followed, several of the key central banks of the mature, industrial world expanded their balance sheets aggressively, in what has become known as the era of quantitative easing (QE). Yet, there were major differences in the motivations and objectives of central banks for their QE programs, which led to very different approaches to their asset expansion practices. In turn, the different implementation methods resulted in very different outcomes, posing strikingly different challenges for their respective economies, with critical implications for future central bank policies. Our research compares and contrasts the activities of the Federal Reserve (Fed) and the European Central Bank (ECB). We come to relatively obvious as well as some potentially controversial conclusions, including the following:Quick and aggressive Fed and ECB actions after the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers and badly managed bailout of AIG more than likely prevented another Great Depression.Later Fed QE programs adopted from 2011, even as the US economy was already recovering, may not have helped job creation at all.The ECB’s focus on liquidity loans calmed financial markets, but did not assist banks in shedding distressed assets and may have hindered economic growth compared to the Fed’s approach to purchase assets, reducing bank balance and capital requirements and leading to a faster economic recovery.The Fed’s exit from QE is likely to be highly complex, involving delays in returning to a more traditional short-term interest rate policy, diminished contributions to the US Treasury from central bank net earnings, and the potential for loss of some of the Fed’s independence over time as the US Congress increases its oversight concerning the size of the Fed’s balance sheet and potentially large unrealized portfolio losses.The ECB’s initial approach to QE, mostly through loans to the banking system, allowed for the easiest and most natural exit path among the major central banks – just let the loans mature.

Keywords: Economics; Macroeconomics; Monetary Policy; Fiscal Policy; Inflation; Risk Management; Federal Reserve; Quantitative Easing; Taylor Rule (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E02 E44 E52 E6 G32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/9781944659592_0015 (application/pdf)
https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/9781944659592_0015 (text/html)
Ebook Access is available upon purchase.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:wschap:9781944659592_0015

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in World Scientific Book Chapters from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().