Rules First or Practice First? The Paradox of Quality Management in Innovative Projects in Developing Countries: A China Case

Yan Ning and Shang Gao

Chapter 23 in Building a Body of Knowledge in Project Management in Developing Countries, 2023, pp 761-791 from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.

Abstract: Project quality management as one key area of the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) of the Project Management Institute (PMI) is undertaken through the method of plan-do-check-act (PDCA). The PDCA cycle assumes that formal rules (such as regulations and codes) could work as the guidelines. However, these formal rules appear to be less systematic in developing countries, which might lead to a practical paradox. On the one hand, the absence of the formal rules may hinder the adoption of innovative quality management, especially for building and infrastructure projects as they involve operational safety, and that of the end-users and the public. In such a context, the development of rules should be prioritized. On the other hand, innovative projects are often taken as conduits to give rise to the emerging formal rules. This encourages innovative quality management practices to take place prior to setting the rules. How to deal with this paradox remains unknown, and addressing this question may have important implications for quality management in innovative projects in developing countries. This research aims to examine how stakeholders manage the paradox of quality management in innovative projects. China, a developing country, is taken as the empirical setting. One precast project was examined in-depth in order to delineate the trajectory of quality management and development of formal rules. Key findings are: (1) experimentation before full-scale application is necessary; (2) during the experimentation and on-going implementation, it is important to formalize quality management plans; and (3) it is important to engage a wider range of stakeholders (such as clients, contractors, supervisors, government agencies, and professional experts), who could jointly contribute their knowledge to the implementation of the new technology and increase the legitimacy of innovative quality management methods. These findings may inform the quality management of projects and enrich the application of the PMBOK in developing countries.

Keywords: Project Management; Developing Countries; Project Integration Management; Project Scope and Schedule Management; Project Cost and Quality Management; Project Resource and Risk Management; Communications Management; Project Procurement Management; Project Stakeholder Management; Industry Development; Operating Environment of the Industry; Supply Chain Management; Project Leadership; Operating and Facilities Management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L74 O2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/9789811224720_0023 (application/pdf)
https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/9789811224720_0023 (text/html)
Ebook Access is available upon purchase.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:wschap:9789811224720_0023

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in World Scientific Book Chapters from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().