PRICING DISCRETE BARRIER OPTIONS WITH AN ADAPTIVE MESH MODEL
Dong-Hyun Ahn,
Bin Gao and
Stephen Figlewski
Additional contact information
Dong-Hyun Ahn: Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB 3490, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
Bin Gao: Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB 3490, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
Stephen Figlewski: New York University Stern School of Business, 44 West 4th Street, New York, NY 10012-1126, USA
Chapter 13 in Quantitative Analysis in Financial Markets:Collected Papers of the New York University Mathematical Finance Seminar(Volume III), 2002, pp 296-313 from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Abstract:
AbstractMany exotic derivatives do not have closed-form valuation equations, and must be priced by approximation methods. Where they can be applied, standard lattice techniques based on binomial and trinomial trees will achieve correct valuations asymptotically. They can also generally handle American exercise. But for many problems, including pricing barrier options, convergence may be slow and erratic, producing large errors even with thousands of time steps and millions of node calculations. Options with price barriers that are only monitored at discrete points in time present additional difficulty for lattice models. Standard tree methods increase accuracy by shrinking the time and price step size throughout the lattice, but this increases the number of calculations sharply and much of the additional computation is in regions of the tree where it makes little difference to accuracy. A previous paper [4] introduces the Adaptive Mesh Model (AMM) which is a very flexible approach that greatly increases efficiency in trinomial lattices. Coarse time and price steps are used in most of the tree, but small sections of finer mesh are constructed to improve resolution in specific critical areas. This paper presents an especially effective AMM structure for pricing options with discrete barriers. In a basic example, an AMM with 60 time steps is ten times more accurate than a 5000-step trinomial, but runs more than 1000 times faster.
Keywords: Quantitative Analysis; Financial Markets (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/9789812778451_0013 (application/pdf)
https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/9789812778451_0013 (text/html)
Ebook Access is available upon purchase.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:wschap:9789812778451_0013
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in World Scientific Book Chapters from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().