Economic significance of commodity return forecasts from the fractionally cointegrated VAR model

Sepideh Dolatabadi (), Paresh Kumar Narayan (), Morten Nielsen and Ke Xu ()
Additional contact information
Sepideh Dolatabadi: Queen?s University, Postal: Department of Economics, Dunning Hall Room 307, Queen's University, 94 University Avenue, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada
Paresh Kumar Narayan: Deakin University, Postal: BL Deakin Business School, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood VIC 3125, Australia
Ke Xu: Queen?s University, Postal: Department of Economics, Dunning Hall Room 307, Queen's University, 94 University Avenue, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada

CREATES Research Papers from Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University

Abstract: Based on recent evidence of fractional cointegration in commodity spot and futures markets, we investigate whether a fractionally cointegrated model can provide statistically and/or economically significant forecasts of commodity returns. Specifically, we propose to model and forecast commodity spot and futures prices using a fractionally cointegrated vector autoregressive (FCVAR) model that generalizes the more well-known (non-fractional) CVAR model to allow fractional integration. We derive the best linear predictor for the FCVAR model and perform an out-of-sample forecast comparison with the non-fractional model. In our empirical analysis to daily data on 17 commodity markets, the fractional model is found to be superior in terms of in-sample fit and also out-of-sample forecasting based on statistical metrics of forecast comparison. We analyze the economic significance of the forecasts through a dynamic trading strategy based on a portfolio with weights derived from a mean-variance utility function. Although there is much heterogeneity across commodity markets, this analysis leads to statistically significant and economically meaningful profits in most markets, and shows that profits from both the fractional and non-fractional models are higher on average and statistically more significant than profits derived from a simple moving-average strategy. The analysis also shows that, in spite of the statistical advantage of the fractional model, the fractional and non-fractional models generate very similar profits with only a slight advantage to the fractional model on average.

Keywords: commodity markets; economic significance; forecasting; fractional cointegration; futures markets; price discovery; trading rule; vector error correction model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C32 G11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 37
Date: 2017-12-05
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://repec.econ.au.dk/repec/creates/rp/18/rp18_35.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Economic significance of commodity return forecasts from the fractionally cointegrated VAR model (2018)
Working Paper: Economic Significance Of Commodity Return Forecasts From The Fractionally Cointegrated Var Model (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aah:create:2018-35

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CREATES Research Papers from Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().