Agrarian Reform in Uzbekistan: Why Has the Chinese Model Failed to Deliver?

Richard Pomfret

No 1998-16, School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers from University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy

Abstract: The paper analyses the nature and effects of agrarian reform in Uzbekistan. Since becoming independent in late 1991, Uzbekistan has followed a gradual reform path, often invoking the Chinese model. Agrarian reform has resembled China's post-1978 household responsibility system, but has failed to deliver the rapid agricultural growth which followed the Chinese reforms.

Keywords: agrarian reform; Uzbekistan (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q10 Q15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 17 pages
Date: 1998
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Economic Development and Cultural Change, 2000, vol. 48, issue 2, pp. 269-84

Downloads: (external link)
https://media.adelaide.edu.au/economics/papers/doc/wp1998-16.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Agrarian Reform in Uzbekistan: Why Has the Chinese Model Failed to Deliver? (2000)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:adl:wpaper:1998-16

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers from University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Qazi Haque ().