The Static and Dynamic Benefits of Migration and Remittances in Nicaragua
Lykke Andersen () and
Bent Jesper Christensen ()
No 05/2009, Development Research Working Paper Series from Institute for Advanced Development Studies
This paper utilizes a unique three-wave panel of household data from Nicaragua, which allows a thorough exploration of the relationships between migration, remittances and household consumption. The paper distinguishes between the effects of emigration and the impacts of remittances received. There is a self-selection bias in the decision to send a migrant, as well as in the decision to receive remittances. To adequately correct for these selection biases, we develop a bivariate selection correction procedure. Perhaps surprisingly, the results show that households do not benefit (in terms of higher consumption growth) from receiving remittances, but rather from having migrants abroad. This suggests that not only money are remitted from abroad, but also something more subtle, which could be business ideas, belief systems, aspirations, patterns of social interaction, and other intangibles, which have been dubbed social remittances.
Keywords: Migration; Remittances; Social Remittances; Nicaragua; Bivariate Selection Correction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F35 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dev, nep-lam and nep-mig
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:adv:wpaper:200905
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Development Research Working Paper Series from Institute for Advanced Development Studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lykke Andersen ().