Environmental and socio-economic consequences of forest carbon payments in Bolivia: Results of the OSIRIS-Bolivia model
Lykke Andersen (),
Jonah Busch (),
Elizabeth Curran (),
Juan Carlos Ledezma (),
Joaquin Mayorga and
Mélissa Bellier ()
Additional contact information
Jonah Busch: Conservation International – Arlington, Virginia
Elizabeth Curran: CEEMA-INESAD, San Francisco, California
Juan Carlos Ledezma: Conservation International – Bolivia
Mélissa Bellier: University of Montesquieu Bordeaux IV, France
No 02/2012, Development Research Working Paper Series from Institute for Advanced Development Studies
Bolivia has significant potential to abate climate change by reducing deforestation. This opportunity presents economic and environmental tradeoffs. While these tradeoffs have been hotly debated, they have as yet been the subject of little quantitative analysis. We introduce the OSIRIS-Bolivia model to provide a quantitative basis for decision-making. OSIRIS-Bolivia is an Excel-based tool for analyzing the potential effects of incentive payments to reduce emissions from deforestation (REDD) in Bolivia. It is based on a spatial econometric model of deforestation in Bolivia during the period 2001-2005, and uses information on forest cover, deforestation rates, geographical conditions, and drivers of deforestation, including agricultural opportunity costs, for more than 120,000 pixels covering the whole country. OSIRIS-Bolivia is based on a partial equilibrium model in which reductions in deforestation in one region reduce the supply of agricultural products to the domestic market, which in turn causes an increase in the price of agricultural products, making conversion of land to agriculture more attractive and thus stimulating an increase in deforestation in other regions (leakage). The model can help answer questions such as: Where in Bolivia are carbon incentive payments most likely to result in reduced deforestation? Who are most likely to benefit from REDD? How much money will it take to reduce deforestation by a given amount? To what extent might transaction costs or preferences for agricultural income undermine the goals of the REDD program?
Keywords: Deforestation; REDD; environmental impacts; socio-economic impacts (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q21 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-cmp, nep-ene and nep-env
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:adv:wpaper:201202
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Development Research Working Paper Series from Institute for Advanced Development Studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lykke Andersen ().