Overpaid or underpaid? A state-by-state ranking of public-employee compensation
Andrew Biggs (andrew.biggs@aei.org) and
Jason Richwine
AEI Economics Working Papers from American Enterprise Institute
Abstract:
This paper ranks all 50 states according to how costly their public-employee compensation packages are relative to private-sector standards. Each state's package is placed into one of five categories: modest penalty, market level, modest premium, large premium, or very large premium. The results show that national-level analyses obscure significant differences in compensation from state to state. Connecticut, for example, pays its state employees 42 percent more than what similar private-sector workers receive, but Virginia pays its state workers about 6 percent less. State-by-state political interest in public-sector pay aligns fairly well with our results: In states where public sector pay is an active political issue, state government employees appear to be better compensated than similarly-skilled private sector workers. In states where state government compensation is at or below market levels, pay for public employees is generally less controversial.
Keywords: Public Pensions; Policy Papers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aei.org/publication/overpaid-or-underpa ... mployee-compensation (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aei:rpaper:415891
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in AEI Economics Working Papers from American Enterprise Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dave Adams, CIO (administrative.contact@aei.org).