Which is the lower-cost conservation strategy: long- or short-term agreements?
LeRoy Hansen () and
Daniel Hellerstein
No 149976, 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association
Abstract:
Historically, long-term agreements offer an upfront payment as opposed to a series of annual payments. Past research suggests that public preferences for upfront payments are greater than the present-value sum of a series of annual payments. If this condition holds, then program costs can be lowered by offering upfront payments. The driving force behind this condition is that individuals’ have personal rates of discount (PRD) that exceed market discount rates. The objective of this analysis is to use behavior data to test whether landowners’ have PRDs that exceed market. We use contract data from three USDA wetland conservation strategies. Two of the strategies offer annual payments and one offers an upfront payment. This variation allows us to directly test the hypothesis that there is no difference between prds and the market rate. Our results lead us to reject this hypothesis.
Keywords: Environmental Economics and Policy; Public Economics; Resource/Energy Economics and Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 10
Date: 2013
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/149976/files/H ... AAEA%20Poster%20.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:aaea13:149976
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.149976
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().