Male Wages and Female Welfare: Private Markets, Public Goods, and Intrahousehold Inequality

Suman Ghosh and Ravi Kanbur

No 127292, Working Papers from Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management

Abstract: Can an increase in male wages make the woman in the family, or even the whole family, worse off? On the face of it, this seems paradoxical, since the overall resources of the household are improved by the wage increase. This paper shows that the chain reactions set in motion by such a wage increase in labor markets can end up by making not only the woman but the whole family worse off because of the interactions between intrahousehold public goods, extrahousehold public goods, and the outcomes in conventional labor markets. The key is specialization of males and females in different activities, the public goods characteristics of some of these activities, and the effects of the outside options defined by these activities on intrahousehold bargaining.

Keywords: Labor; and; Human; Capital (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 17
Date: 2002-06
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/127292/files/Cornell_Dyson_wp0215.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Male wages and female welfare: private markets, public goods, and intrahousehold inequality (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:cudawp:127292

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.127292

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().