Land sharing vs. land sparing for biodiversity: How agricultural markets make the difference
Bruno Dorin () and
No 182809, 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia from European Association of Agricultural Economists
We show that whether intensive or extensive farming is most beneficial to biodiversity depends on the equilibrium of agricultural markets. With higher production costs, extensive farming tends to be more beneficial to biodiversity than intensive farming, except when there is a very high degree of convexity between biodiversity and yield. Extensive farming is detrimental to consumers while its effect on agricultural producers is indeterminate. It has no straightforward effect on food security, but could decrease the pressure on protected areas. Additional demand f reinforces the preference for extensive farming, especially in the case of animal feed.
Keywords: Land; Economics/Use (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/182809/files/De ... odiversity-143_a.pdf (application/pdf)
Working Paper: Land sharing vs. land sparing for biodiversity: how agricultural markets make the difference (2015)
Working Paper: Land sharing vs. land sparing for biodiversity: How agricultural markets make the difference (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:eaae14:182809
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia from European Association of Agricultural Economists Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().